Monday, November 19, 2007

Dodge Durango vs Toyota Sequoia

by Dan Lienert

These days, Wall Street's industry analysts love to talk about how the Japanese are threatening America's last bastion of automotive dominance: trucks. But as the following comparison of one of the best American sport utility vehicles and one of the best from Japan indicates, the threat is still a distant one (the government considers SUVs "light trucks").


Toyota Motor's Sequoia SUV is longer than DaimlerChrysler's Dodge Durango. The Sequoia seats one more passenger than the Durango (eight versus seven) and has the Toyota badge on it, which means an excellent reputation for quality and reliability. Yet in 2004, the Durango outsold the Sequoia in the United States by a ratio of nearly 2.5-to-1.

Toyota's vehicles--with a few exceptions such as its Echo compact--are among the most competitive in the auto business, and in several cases outsell their American competitors. One need not look too hard, however, to see why the cheaper and more powerful Durango is cleaning house in the showrooms.

For one thing, its volume is increasing because it is, in effect, a hot new player in the full-size SUV game. The Durango used to be more of a midsize SUV, but the vehicle bulked up to 201 inches of overall length after a 2004 overhaul and entered the 204-inch Sequoia's ken.

With added competition from Nissan Motor's new, full-size Armada SUV--whose named was changed from Pathfinder Armada to avoid confusion with Nissan's Pathfinder SUV--the Sequoia is beginning to look old. Its styling isn't great, and, unlike those of the Durango, its buyers can't answer contemporary advertising by saying, "This thing does indeed have a HEMI."

Daimler has had surprising success at resuscitating HEMI, the brand name its Chrysler Group (including Dodge) uses on certain large, high-horsepower engines. According to a statement released in December, Chrysler Group has sold more than 469,000 vehicles with a HEMI inside since introducing its 5.7-liter HEMI V-8 engine for the 2003 model year. In Chrysler Group vehicles where HEMI is offered, the take-rate is 46%. In addition to its optional, 335-hp HEMI V-8, the Durango offers an interior that is comparatively upscale for a Detroit car, and is one of the best examples of Detroit's forte: truck building.

General Motors Ford Motor and Chrysler still build attractive, powerful trucks. Nissan is encroaching on traditional Detroit territory with increasingly big truck engines, and Toyota's next generation full-size pickup--the replacement for the Tundra--will be more on the money in terms of styling.

But America's seeming embrace of domestic truck styling is a mitigating factor in the success of vehicles such as the Durango. The handsome looks of Ford's F-Series pickups help make them the country's best-selling vehicles; after all, the F-Series' competitors offer comparable engines, body styles and varieties of configurations, and have similarly less-than-perfect reputations for reliability.

American truck makers also have more dealers here than the Japanese, and a different audience. The Durango and Sequoia are body-on-frame trucks--vehicles in which the body structures are attached to separate frames, as opposed to the combined body-and-chassis structures of "unitized" cars--and buyers of such vehicles have traditionally tended to be blue collar and, in many cases, distrusting of import brands.

Of course, Toyota's reputation is sterling, and even traditional American truck buyers can't deny the Sequoia. It has 282 hp and a well-designed, roomy interior. It is sold by dealers who don't have a reputation for being particularly friendly, but offer extremely high-quality cars.

However, the Durango also has a geographic advantage over the Sequoia. The popularity and reputation of Japanese cars stems from America's coasts and branches out to the country's middle. But trucks are more popular in the heartland, in places such as the Deep South, the Sun Belt and the Midwest, where far more trucks exist per capita than on the coasts. Trucks are thus something of a red-state phenomenon, something that plays more into the hands of the Midwest-based American automakers than the blue-state-oriented Japanese.

Wall Street analysts recognize a significant threat to domestic automakers. The Japanese are on the way to America with more and bigger trucks--not to mention more and more North American production thereof. Please see the slide show for a closer look at the battle between two of the best light trucks out there.

from here

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Dodge Dakota vs Toyota Tundra

Utility
Drivers with frequent child-duty might favor the Tundra over the Dodge. There's no clear winner between the Dodge Dakota and the Toyota Tundra regarding transporting cargo. There's little the Dodge Dakota can tow that the Toyota cannot.

Performance
The Dodge Dakota is likely to feel a tad slow because of its high horsepower-to-weight ratio compared to the Toyota Tundra. As far as horsepower, the Toyota packs quite a punch and will knock the Dakota down a few rungs. However, note that high horsepower engines often command higher insurance premiums.

Dimensions
The Toyota Tundra is markedly more ponderous than the Dodge. Your wallet will hurt more every time you fill up the Toyota Tundra than the Dakota because of its larger tank. The Toyota Tundra rides lower than the Dodge, which is a good thing for its center of gravity and ease of access. The Toyota Tundra and the Dodge Dakota compete for the same parking spaces.

Convenience
The Dodge Dakota's fuel tank will need to be replenished a bit more often than the unit in the Toyota.

Cost
In terms of gas mileage, the Dodge Dakota and the Toyota Tundra don't differ much. The Toyota Tundra will tax your gas budget markedly more than the Dodge will. The Toyota Tundra isn't much more expensive than the Dodge when it comes to MSRP. The Toyota Tundra is significantly more expensive than the Dodge Dakota as far as out-the-door price.

Handling
The Dakota and the Toyota have roughly similar tires. With their comparable turning circles, the Dodge Dakota and the Tundra very likely handle roughly the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The Toyota Tundra's engine is considerably more sizeable than the Dakota's. Remember that more massive engines may use more gasoline than smaller ones. The Tundra packs quite a punch compared to the Dodge Dakota with respect to torque, which is the force that lets you accelerate quickly. Torque is roughly equivalent to acceleration, and in this respect, the Tundra is significantly more powerful than the Dodge Dakota.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the Toyota Tundra offers a bit more head room than the Dodge Dakota, there frankly isn't much of a difference. While the rear of the Dodge Dakota provides a bit more head- and leg-room than the Toyota Tundra, there honestly isn't much of a difference.

Overview
The Toyota and the Dodge Dakota have the same basic warranty.
from here

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Dodge Ram vs Toyota Tacoma

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. The Tacoma is considerably cheaper to get to the dealership than the Dodge. Regarding fuel economy, the Tacoma bests the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500. The Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 consumes a lot of gasoline compared to the Tacoma. In terms of MSRP, the Toyota Tacoma costs quite a bit less than the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500. Regarding final price, the Toyota Tacoma costs quite a bit less than the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500. The Toyota Tacoma will save you a bundle at the pump every year compared to the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500.

Utility
Drivers with frequent kid-duty might favor the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 over the Toyota Tacoma. There's no clear winner between the Toyota Tacoma and the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 when it comes to hauling capacity. Towing is markedly more the Dodge's forte than it is the Toyota Tacoma's.

Convenience
You will definitely have to visit your friendly gas station more often with the Toyota Tacoma than with the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500. The Toyota Tacoma's fuel tank will need to be replenished more often than the unit in the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the Dodge offers a bit more head room than the Toyota, there frankly isn't much of a difference. The ampler interior dimensions of the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 make it quite a bit roomier for your passengers than the Tacoma.

Dimensions
The Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 is markedly heavier than the Toyota Tacoma. Your wallet will hurt more every time you fill up the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 than the Toyota Tacoma because of its more capacious tank. The Toyota Tacoma rides lower than the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500, which is a good thing for its center of gravity and ease of access. The Toyota Tacoma fits in smaller parking spaces than the Ram Pickup 1500. The Toyota's shorter wheelbase will give a more agile feel in daily traffic. On the flip side, the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 is likely to have a smoother, more stable ride.

Performance
Both the Toyota Tacoma and the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 are likely to feel a little sluggish because of their high horsepower-to-weight ratio. In terms of horsepower, the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 packs quite a punch and will knock the Toyota Tacoma down a few rungs. On the flip side, note that high horsepower engines often command higher insurance premiums.

Handling
With its tighter turning circle, the Toyota Tacoma is very likely more agile than the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500, something to consider if you do a lot of city driving; however, remember that a vehicle with a tight turning circle may feel a bit twitchy on the highway.

Drivetrain
The Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 has a bigger engine than the Toyota Tacoma. Note that smaller engines are often cheaper to fix, but a smaller engine usually has to work a little harder. Torque equals pickup, and the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 will have picked up and gone by the time the Toyota Tacoma finally gets moving. Torque is roughly equivalent to acceleration, and in this respect, the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 is tremendously more powerful than the Toyota Tacoma.

Overview
The Dodge and the Toyota Tacoma have the same basic warranty.

Other
The Toyota Tacoma emits fewer smog-forming pollutants per 15,000 miles than the Dodge.

from here

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Dodge Charger

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. It costs roughly the same to get the Dodge Charger to the dealership as the typical fullsize sedan. There really isn't much of a difference in gas mileage here, but if you must know, the typical fullsize sedan is slightly more economical than the Dodge Charger. In terms of gas mileage, the typical fullsize sedan and the Dodge Charger don't differ much. The typical fullsize sedan is markedly less costly than the Charger as far as MSRP.

Utility
There's no clear winner between the typical fullsize sedan and the Dodge Charger regarding transporting cargo. The Charger and the typical fullsize sedan can accommodate the same number of passengers. The Dodge Charger outpulls the typical fullsize sedan by a big margin.

Convenience
The Dodge Charger's fuel tank will need to be replenished a tad more often than the unit in the typical fullsize sedan.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the typical fullsize sedan offers a bit more head room than the Dodge Charger, there frankly isn't much of a difference. While the rear of the typical fullsize sedan provides a bit more head- and leg-room than the Dodge Charger, there frankly isn't much of a difference.

Dimensions
The Dodge Charger is a bit heavier than the typical fullsize sedan. The average fullsize sedan's tank is roughly the same size as the Charger's, though the Charger's is a tad more capacious. The Charger and the average fullsize sedan compete for the same parking spaces.

Performance
Regarding horsepower, the Charger packs quite a punch and will knock the average fullsize sedan down a few rungs. On the other hand, keep in mind that high horsepower engines often command higher insurance premiums.

Handling
The typical fullsize sedan and the Dodge Charger have about comparable tires. With their similar turning radiuses, the Dodge Charger and the typical fullsize sedan doubtless handle about the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The average fullsize sedan's engine is considerably smaller than the Dodge Charger's. Keep in mind that smaller engines can be stressed more; on the flip side, smaller engines are often cheaper to fix. The Charger packs quite a punch compared to the average fullsize sedan as far as torque, which is the force that lets you accelerate quickly.

Overview
The basic after-sale protection that comes with the Charger isn't quite as generous as the typical fullsize sedan's. When it comes to after-sale protection against corrosion, the typical fullsize sedan and the Dodge Charger have significantly similar coverage.


from here

Toyota Avalon

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. It costs roughly the same to get the Toyota Avalon to the dealership as the Dodge Charger. With respect to gas mileage, the Avalon has the Dodge beat. The Dodge Charger will tax your gas budget substantially more than the Toyota Avalon will. As far as MSRP, the Dodge doesn't cost much less than the Toyota. The Dodge Charger will cost you a bunch of money in gas every year compared to the Toyota Avalon.

Utility
The Dodge Charger's more massive trunk will accommodate more sizeable objects than the Toyota Avalon. The Dodge Charger and the Toyota Avalon can accommodate the same number of passengers. Towing is substantially more the Dodge Charger's forte than it is the Avalon's.

Convenience
You'll quite certainly have to take the Charger for a fill-up more often than the Toyota because of its tank size and gas mileage.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the Toyota offers a bit more head room than the Dodge, there frankly isn't much of a difference. The Avalon offers more head- and leg-room to your passengers than the Dodge Charger does.

Dimensions
The Dodge Charger is markedly more ponderous than the Toyota Avalon. The Toyota Avalon's tank is approximately the same size as the Dodge Charger's, though the Dodge's is a little larger. The Avalon and the Charger compete for the same parking spaces. The Dodge Charger's longer wheelbase will likely result in a smoother, more stable ride; however, the Toyota may give a more agile feel in daily traffic.

Performance
As far as horsepower, the Charger packs quite a wallop and will knock the Toyota Avalon down a few rungs. On the flip side, keep in mind that high horsepower engines often command higher insurance premiums.

Handling
The Dodge Charger's rear-wheel drive layout likely gives it better dry traction than the Toyota Avalon; however, the Toyota Avalon's front-wheel drive layout likely provides better traction in rain, snow or ice. The Dodge Charger and the Toyota Avalon have about comparable tires. With their comparable turning circles, the Toyota and the Dodge definitely handle roughly the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The Dodge's engine is tremendously larger than the Avalon's. Note that larger engines may use more gas than smaller ones. Torque equals pickup, and the Dodge Charger will have picked up and gone by the time the Toyota Avalon finally gets moving.

Overview
The Toyota Avalon and the Dodge Charger have the same basic after-sale protection.

from here

Dodge Charger vs Toyota Avalon

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. It costs roughly the same to get the Toyota Avalon to the dealership as the Dodge Charger. With respect to gas mileage, the Avalon has the Dodge beat. The Dodge Charger will tax your gas budget substantially more than the Toyota Avalon will. As far as MSRP, the Dodge doesn't cost much less than the Toyota. The Dodge Charger will cost you a bunch of money in gas every year compared to the Toyota Avalon.

Utility
The Dodge Charger's more massive trunk will accommodate more sizeable objects than the Toyota Avalon. The Dodge Charger and the Toyota Avalon can accommodate the same number of passengers. Towing is substantially more the Dodge Charger's forte than it is the Avalon's.

Convenience
You'll quite certainly have to take the Charger for a fill-up more often than the Toyota because of its tank size and gas mileage.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the Toyota offers a bit more head room than the Dodge, there frankly isn't much of a difference. The Avalon offers more head- and leg-room to your passengers than the Dodge Charger does.

Dimensions
The Dodge Charger is markedly more ponderous than the Toyota Avalon. The Toyota Avalon's tank is approximately the same size as the Dodge Charger's, though the Dodge's is a little larger. The Avalon and the Charger compete for the same parking spaces. The Dodge Charger's longer wheelbase will likely result in a smoother, more stable ride; however, the Toyota may give a more agile feel in daily traffic.

Performance
As far as horsepower, the Charger packs quite a wallop and will knock the Toyota Avalon down a few rungs. On the flip side, keep in mind that high horsepower engines often command higher insurance premiums.

Handling
The Dodge Charger's rear-wheel drive layout likely gives it better dry traction than the Toyota Avalon; however, the Toyota Avalon's front-wheel drive layout likely provides better traction in rain, snow or ice. The Dodge Charger and the Toyota Avalon have about comparable tires. With their comparable turning circles, the Toyota and the Dodge definitely handle roughly the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The Dodge's engine is tremendously larger than the Avalon's. Note that larger engines may use more gas than smaller ones. Torque equals pickup, and the Dodge Charger will have picked up and gone by the time the Toyota Avalon finally gets moving.

Overview
The Toyota Avalon and the Dodge Charger have the same basic after-sale protection.


fron here

The History of the Toyota Celica

It is 1998 and the Celica is clinging to life. The MR2 and Supra have been withdrawn to Japanese shores and the Celica is on life support. The current model of the Celica hasn't been truly redesigned since 1993...an eternity when you consider the short life spans of sporty cars. Although the Celica is officially produced until 1999 many US Toyota dealers don't even see the model on their lots.
Rumors have the Celica disappearing from the Toyota lineup entirely.

Toyota decides to completely revamp the Celica and give the market what it is looking for. Aiming for the market that Honda has dominated so well for the past few years with the Civic/Integra, Toyota aims directly for the top of the line Integra GS-R. No longer building
the Celica as a sporty/luxury car, the Toyota Celica is now designed for the inexpensive performance minded market. Extreme, Young and Racy is the new target Toyota is hoping to meet with the new Celica...

Design-wise Toyota turns to its CALTY design center to find a design that appeals to the younger market. Turning outside the Japanese designers Toyota hopes depart from the conservative "safe" image that Toyota is all too well known for. Below are the Sketches
that Toyota decides to aim for.










Aiming squarely for the top of the Integra line, Toyota turns to Yamaha to produce an engine that outperforms the Honda version in every way. The Honda patent for variable valve timing (VTEC) expires and Toyota is now allowed to introduce its version variable valve timing in the form of VVTl-i (Variable Valve Timing with lift and intelligence). A technology which is superior to Honda's VTEC Toyota and Yamaha introduce this new technology in the Celica with the
2ZZ-GE engine. In a factory built engine Toyota nearly matches Honda's hand assembled, port and polished Integra Type-R, and does away clearly dominates Honda's stock output in the GS-R (160HP)...clearly an accomplishment.

The first the public sees of the new exciting Celica comes in the form of the Toyota XYR concept at the Detroit International Auto show in 1999....










With rave reviews, Toyota almost immediately begins production for a release later in the year. Aside from the huge aluminum spoiler the XYR basically becomes the new seventh generation Celica. Toyota releases the Celica in two trims worldwide...the GT with a 140HP engine with VVT-i and the GTS with a stated 180HP or 192 HP from 1.8L with VVTl-i. Europe receives the GT-S one year later.








North American GT




North American GT-S

from here

Dodge Ram Vs Toyota Celica (Video)

Dodge Ram or Toyota Celica? Who will win this street race?

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Russian car crash Toyota Land Cruiser

Of couse it is a site offtop, it is incredible, 20-years old russian car VAZ-2106 crash japanese Toyota Land Cruiser






Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Toyota Tacoma

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. It costs approximately the same to get the Toyota Tacoma to the dealership as the average compact crew cab truck. There isn't much of a difference in gas mileage here, but if you must know, the average compact crew cab truck is somewhat more economical than the Toyota Tacoma. The typical compact crew cab truck won't save you much money at the pump compared to the Toyota Tacoma. When it comes to MSRP, the typical compact crew cab truck costs substantially less than the Tacoma.

Utility
Neither the Toyota Tacoma nor the average compact crew cab truck has a marked advantage as far as seating capacity. There's no clear winner between the Tacoma and the average compact crew cab truck with respect to transporting cargo. Towing is considerably more the typical compact crew cab truck's forte than it is the Toyota Tacoma's.

Convenience
The typical compact crew cab truck's fuel tank will need to be replenished somewhat more often than the unit in the Toyota Tacoma. You indubitably won't have to visit your friendly gas station more often with the Toyota Tacoma than with the average compact crew cab truck, because both offer comparable mileage ranges.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the Tacoma offers a bit more head room than the typical compact crew cab truck, there frankly isn't much of a difference. The typical compact crew cab truck offers more head- and leg-room to your passengers than the Toyota Tacoma does.

Dimensions
Both the Toyota Tacoma and the typical compact crew cab truck are likely to feel a tad slow because of their high horsepower-to-weight ratio. The average compact crew cab truck's tank is roughly the same size as the Toyota Tacoma's, though the Toyota Tacoma's is a bit bigger. The Toyota Tacoma rides lower than the average compact crew cab truck, which is a good thing for its center of gravity and ease of access. The typical compact crew cab truck and the Tacoma compete for the same parking spaces.

Performance
Both the Toyota Tacoma and the typical compact crew cab truck are likely to feel a tad sluggish because of their high horsepower-to-weight ratio.

Handling
The Toyota Tacoma and the average compact crew cab truck have approximately similar tires. With their similar turning circles, the Toyota Tacoma and the typical compact crew cab truck indubitably handle roughly the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The Toyota Tacoma's engine is a tad smaller than the typical compact crew cab truck's, but not terribly so. Torque is roughly equivalent to acceleration, and in this respect, the average compact crew cab truck isn't much more powerful than the Toyota Tacoma.

Overview
Although the basic warranty that comes with the typical compact crew cab truck is slightly longer than the Tacoma's, the difference isn't too significant.

Other
The typical compact crew cab truck produces fewer smog-forming pollutants per 15,000 miles than the Toyota Tacoma.

from here

Dodge Dakota

Utility
The Dakota will very likely prove handier than the average compact crew cab truck for those of you with frequent kid-cargo. The Dodge Dakota is likely a better choice than the average compact crew cab truck with respect to hauling capacity, especially if you frequently need to carry a lot of equipment or sizeable beasts. The Dodge Dakota outpulls the typical compact crew cab truck by a big margin.

Performance
Both the Dodge Dakota and the typical compact crew cab truck are likely to feel somewhat sluggish because of their high horsepower-to-weight ratio.

Dimensions
The Dakota is considerably heavier than the typical compact crew cab truck. The average compact crew cab truck's tank is about the same size as the Dodge Dakota's, though the Dodge Dakota's is a tad larger. The average compact crew cab truck and the Dodge Dakota compete for the same parking spaces. The average compact crew cab truck's shorter wheelbase will give a nimbler feel in daily traffic. However, the Dodge Dakota is likely to have a smoother, more stable ride.

Convenience
You likely won't have to visit your friendly gas station more often with the Dodge Dakota than with the typical compact crew cab truck, as both offer similar ranges. The average compact crew cab truck's fuel tank will need to be replenished a tad more often than the unit in the Dakota.

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. It costs approximately the same to get the Dodge Dakota to the dealership as the average compact crew cab truck. With respect to fuel economy, the average compact crew cab truck and the Dakota don't differ much. The average compact crew cab truck won't save you much money at the pump compared to the Dodge Dakota. The Dodge Dakota consumes a lot of gas compared to the average compact crew cab truck. The average compact crew cab truck is considerably less expensive than the Dodge Dakota as far as MSRP. The average compact crew cab truck isn't much less costly than the Dodge Dakota regarding out-the-door cost.

Handling
The Dodge Dakota has quite a bit bigger tires than the typical compact crew cab truck. Remember that wider tires may improve handling, while narrower tires might provide better handling in deep snow. With their comparable turning circles, the typical compact crew cab truck and the Dodge Dakota indubitably handle approximately the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The Dakota's engine is markedly larger than the typical compact crew cab truck's. Keep in mind that larger engines may use more gas than smaller ones. Torque equals pickup, and the Dodge Dakota will have picked up and gone by the time the average compact crew cab truck finally gets moving.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the Dodge Dakota offers a bit more head room than the average compact crew cab truck, there really isn't much of a difference. The average compact crew cab truck is not particularly roomier for your passengers than the Dodge Dakota.

Overview
Although the basic warranty that comes with the average compact crew cab truck is slightly longer than the Dakota's, the difference isn't too significant. In terms of after-sale protection against rust, the average compact crew cab truck and the Dodge Dakota have markedly similar coverage.

Other
The average compact crew cab truck emits fewer smog-forming pollutants per 15,000 miles than the Dakota.

from here

Dodge Dakota vs Toyota Tacoma

When your kids reach a certain age, they won't want to sit at the kids' table at parties. They won't want to order from the kids' menu. And before you know it, they definitely won't want to be called kids anymore.

By the same token, DaimlerChrysler's Dodge Dakota and Toyota Motor's Tacoma pickup--both of which were recently overhauled--are trying to shake off their former images as compact pickups. Both have grown so much in size that we can't call them compacts anymore.

Such is the nature of pickup development: In America--the only pickup market that really matters--we like our trucks to continue to get bigger over time, and more rugged.

Redesigned models of the Dakota and Tacoma went on sale last fall, and both are considerably bigger now. The Dakota is trying to look and feel larger-than-life. It has an optional V-8 engine--a power plant usually reserved for full-size pickups--and its aggressive looks mimic the styling of the full-size, cars-don't-get-any-more-aggressive-looking-than-this Dodge Ram pickup.

If Dodge prepared the new Dakota to look meaner, that makes sense: The Dakota is on its way to a dogfight. While pickups and truck-based automobiles such as sport utility vehicles make up one of the last arenas in which American automakers can and do compete, Japanese automakers have been slowly mounting an attack on the truck market.

The Tacoma and other Toyota trucks offer buyers pickups--the most popular vehicles in America due to their versatility--that come with the same bullet-proof reputation for reliability that consumers have come to know in passenger cars such as the Toyota Camry sedan. Add to this the fact that the entry-level Tacoma is one of the most affordable pickups available, and you can see why the Tacoma is handily outselling the Dakota in this country. In the first quarter of 2005, Toyota sold 34,000 Tacomas in the United States; Dodge sold 25,000 Dakotas.

While Dodge's Dakota tally in the first quarter of this year was an improvement over sales in the first quarter of 2004, Tacoma sales declined 8% compared with the first quarter of 2004. This is unusual. Typically, sales decline in a model's last year and increase after the arrival of the new model.

"There was a considerable ramp-up lag by the time we got all the different models in the pipeline. There are something like 18 different configurations [of the Tacoma]," said a Toyota spokesperson in a recent phone interview. In other words, Toyota is following its usual strategy with the new truck: build the volume slowly and conservatively.

While America's three best-selling vehicles are ordinarily Ford Motor's F-Series, General Motors' Chevrolet Silverado and the Ram--all American pickups--the beating the Dakota is taking at the hands of the Tacoma demonstrates that Wall Street analysts aren't being paranoid or delusional when they say the Japanese are assaulting the truck market. The Japanese are--and American automakers should be terrified. For a closer look at the situation, please follow the link below.

by Dan Lienert

Monday, May 28, 2007

Dodge Caliber (2007)


Price: $13,850 – $20,045
Snapshot
EPA Fuel Economy: City: 23 – 28 Highway: 26 – 32
Available Engines: 148-hp, 1.8-liter I-4
158-hp, 2.0-liter I-4
172-hp, 2.4-liter I-4
Available Transmissions:
2-speed CVT w/OD
2-speed CVT w/OD and auto-manual
5-speed manual w/OD

New or Notable
Four-door hatchback
Optional drink cooler
Illuminated cupholders
Stain-resistant cargo area
Three engine choices
Manual or automatic

What We Like
Engine quality
Responsive CVT
Quiet cabin
Good handling
Front- or all-wheel drive
Standard side-curtain airbags

What We Don't
Well-equipped version extra $2,000
AWD on R/T only (early 2006)
Manual on SE only (early 2006)
Front-seat side-impact airbags come later
Stability system comes later

Vehicle Summary
The Dodge Caliber is a five-seat four-door hatchback that replaces the compact Neon. The Neon was a sedan, and Dodge won't say if a sedan will come next, but it might be significant that the Dodge Magnum had no sedan sister for about a year. Its sedan cousin came in the form of the Chrysler 300. The Dodge Charger sedan was added later.
The Dodge Caliber is a five-seat four-door hatchback that replaces the compact Neon. The Neon was a sedan, and Dodge won't say if a sedan will come next, but it might be significant that the Dodge Magnum had no sedan sister for about a year. Its sedan cousin came in the form of the Chrysler 300. The Dodge Charger sedan was added later.

Vehicle Overview
The Dodge Caliber is a five-seat four-door hatchback that replaces the compact Neon. The Neon was a sedan, and Dodge won't say if a sedan will come next, but it might be significant that the Dodge Magnum had no sedan sister for about a year. Its sedan cousin came in the form of the Chrysler 300. The Dodge Charger sedan was added later.

The Caliber fits in a class among the Ford Focus ZX5, Pontiac Vibe, Subaru Impreza wagon and Toyota Matrix. It's an ambitious project — a "world car" intended for sale in nearly 100 countries in both left- and right-hand drive and with a choice of three gasoline engines and, overseas, one diesel. In North America it will come in SE, SXT and R/T trim levels.

When it goes on sale, the Caliber will be the debut model for a new platform developed with Mitsubishi. It's built alongside the upcoming Jeep Compass in the Belvedere, Ill., assembly plant that formerly built the Neon. The new engine family — also a joint venture, with Mitsubishi Motors Corp. and Korea's Hyundai Motor Co. — is also built domestically, at a jointly owned plant in Dundee, Mich.

Exterior
The Caliber is clearly a Dodge, thanks to the crosshair grille — and the signature red paint that seems to adorn all Dodge models upon their introduction. It resembles the Magnum, though the latter is a wagon with a longer nose and cargo area. The Magnum's controversial greenhouse — short relative to the bodyside — appears again here. The Caliber has very large wheels for a car of its size and class: Fifteen-inch steel wheels with wheel covers are standard on the SE, but the SXT jumps to 17-inch aluminum wheels, and the R/T's are 18 inches. A black rail that runs from the base of the A-pillars and along the roofline to the taillights tricks the eye into seeing a lower, sleeker shape — a design element used previously on the Chrysler Pacifica. Despite the look, the Caliber actually sits a bit higher than a common compact car.

The rear end, and especially the taillights, seem borrowed from the Chevrolet Malibu Maxx, but the overall effect here is good and modern.

Interior
Designed to compete with some of the nicer compact models on the market, the interior has decent-quality materials, a sophisticated design and two-tone color schemes, even in the base trim level. Be the transmission manual or automatic, the shifter juts out from the dashboard's center control panel. Many people complain about this placement, but it's not likely to go away, especially in a world car. Overseas buyers prefer this location, and it also frees up some space by eliminating a floor console.

The cargo floor is plastic, similar to that of the Matrix and Vibe, to ease cleaning. The panel itself can be removed. For the truly filthy, stain-resistant seat upholstery will come later in the year.

There are many slick features in the Caliber, including illuminated cupholder rings, an MP3-player holster and a center armrest that slides forward 3 inches for improved comfort. The SXT and R/T trim levels add a 60/40-split, folding backseat and a folding front passenger seat to extend the cargo area. A 115-volt household power outlet is optional, as is a ceiling-mounted flashlight. The rechargeable unit can be reached from behind the car or from the backseat.

The glove compartment has upper and lower sections, the bottom of which can serve as the optional Chill Zone beverage cooler. Connected to the air conditioning, it chills up to three cans or bottles that rest on a contoured mat. We've seen heated/cooled compartments before, but this one cools even when the cabin heat is on, by running the air-conditioning compressor.

MusicGate Power is Dodge's name for a Boston Acoustics premium audio system with two special speakers in the liftgate itself. They face forward normally, but when the liftgate is raised, they can be swung down to aim rearward and play for tailgate partiers or other such loiterers. The feature is shared with the Jeep Compass.

Under the Hood
The 1.8-, 2.0- and 2.4-liter versions of the four-cylinder engine produce 148, 158 and 172 horsepower, respectively. In addition to increasing with engine size, the torque output also characteristically comes at lower engine speeds. The ratings are: 125 pounds-feet at 5,200 rpm, 141 pounds-feet at 5,000 rpm and 165 pounds-feet at 4,400 rpm for the small, medium and large engines, respectively. The EPA-estimated city/highway fuel economy for each is 28/32 mpg, 26/30 mpg and 23/26 mpg, again respectively.

The engines are very modern: all aluminum with variable valve timing and flow-control valves in the air intake that help ensure complete, clean combustion at all engine speeds.

Currently the SE and SXT trim levels come with the 1.8-liter and five-speed manual. The 2.0-liter and continuously variable automatic transmission are optional. Front-wheel drive is the only choice at these levels. The R/T comes only with the 2.4-liter, CVT and all-wheel drive. An R/T with a manual gearbox and front-wheel drive is promised for October 2006.

Disc/drum brakes are standard; four-wheel discs and antilock brakes with brake assist are optional in some cases.

Safety
In addition to the required airbags, the Caliber has standard side curtain-type airbags and a driver's knee airbag designed to keep the driver positioned properly for the primary restraints. Front seat-mounted side-impact airbags will become an option later in the year along with an electronic stability system and traction control.

Toyota Matrix (2007)


Price: $15,410 – $16,890

Snapshot
EPA Fuel Economy: City: 29 – 30 Highway: 34 – 36
Available Engines: 126-hp, 1.8-liter I-4
Available Transmissions: 4-speed automatic w/OD
5-speed manual w/OD

New or Notable
FWD or AWD
Hatchback body style
Manual or automatic
Versatile interior layout

What We Like
Interior space
Highway stability
Toyota reputation for reliability
Resale value

What We Don't
Instrument readability
Engine and road noise
Engine performance with automatic

Vehicle Summary
Toyota introduced its youth-focused Matrix as an early 2003 model. Described as a crossover utility vehicle, the Matrix was said to combine the functionality of a sport utility vehicle with the image and performance of a sports car. That's no longer the case, as the 2007 model year sees the end of its high-performance XRS variant and optional all-wheel-drive system. Pontiac markets a related Vibe model.

Vehicle Overview
Toyota introduced its youth-focused Matrix as an early 2003 model. Described as a crossover utility vehicle, the Matrix was said to combine the functionality of a sport utility vehicle with the image and performance of a sports car. That's no longer the case, as the 2007 model year sees the end of its high-performance XRS variant and optional all-wheel-drive system. Pontiac markets a related Vibe model.

High headroom and flexible seating positions are among the Matrix's remaining notable attributes. Two trim levels are available: base and step-up XR. A special-edition M-Theory package attempts to restore some of the XRS' luster with upgraded wheels, paint and brakes — though it's more show than go, as Toyota's high-performance 1.8-liter inline-four is gone from the picture. Toyota will limit M-Theory production to 2,500 units.

An electronic stability system and six-CD stereo are among the notable options.

Exterior
The Matrix hatchback is built on a platform similar to the one used for Toyota's popular Corolla sedan. Measuring 171.3 inches long overall, the Matrix has a 102.4-inch wheelbase and stands 61.6 inches tall. Base wheels measure 16 inches in diameter. The M-Theory edition adds 17-inch alloy wheels, four-wheel-disc brakes, a rear spoiler and a strut tower brace under the hood for reduced body roll.

Interior
The Matrix seats up to five people. With the rear seats folded, cargo capacity measures 53.2 cubic feet. Standard equipment includes air conditioning, intermittent wipers, a CD player and a tilt steering wheel. The XR adds remote keyless entry, a sport steering wheel, driver's seat height adjustment, and power windows, locks and mirrors.

Under the Hood
The 1.8-liter four-cylinder produces 126 horsepower. Either a four-speed automatic or five-speed manual transmission can be installed.

Safety
Side-impact and side curtain airbags are optional. Optional antilock brakes are disc/drum on base and XR models, and all-disc with the M-Theory. An electronic stability system is also optional.

Driving Impressions
The Matrix is stylish, well-built and nicely designed, but it's somewhat noisy. It's quiet enough when cruising, but the engine may growl and whine during acceleration. Road noise is also noticeable. The engine teamed with the automatic transmission doesn't have much oomph, either. Automatic-transmission gear changes are noticeable but not bothersome.

Stability is good, and it's easy to keep the Matrix on course. It steers with more precision and less wheel vibration than the Corolla, but still falls short of stimulating.

Dodge Caliber vs Toyota Matrix

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. It costs roughly the same to get the Dodge Caliber to the dealership as the Toyota Matrix. The Toyota Matrix isn't much less expensive than the Dodge Caliber when it comes to MSRP. The Dodge Caliber will cost you a bundle in gas every year compared to the Matrix.

Utility
There's no obvious winner between the Matrix and the Dodge Caliber regarding transporting cargo. The Dodge and the Toyota Matrix can accommodate the same number of passengers.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the Toyota Matrix offers a bit more head room than the Dodge, there honestly isn't much of a difference. While the rear of the Toyota Matrix offers a bit more head- and leg-room than the Dodge, there frankly isn't much of a difference.

Dimensions
The Dodge Caliber is considerably heavier than the Toyota Matrix. The Toyota Matrix's tank is about the same size as the Dodge Caliber's, though the Dodge Caliber's is a little larger. The Caliber rides lower than the Toyota Matrix, which is a good thing for its center of gravity and ease of access. The Toyota Matrix and the Dodge Caliber compete for the same parking spaces.

Performance
In terms of horsepower, the Dodge Caliber packs quite a wallop and will knock the Toyota down a few rungs. On the other hand, remember that high horsepower engines often command higher insurance premiums.

Handling
The Dodge Caliber and the Toyota Matrix have roughly similar tires.

Drivetrain
The Toyota Matrix's engine is considerably smaller than the Dodge's. Remember that smaller engines can be stressed more; on the flip side, smaller engines are often cheaper to fix. Torque equals pickup, and the Dodge Caliber will have picked up and gone by the time the Toyota Matrix finally gets moving. Torque is roughly equivalent to acceleration, and in this respect, the Dodge is markedly more powerful than the Toyota Matrix.