Monday, November 19, 2007

Dodge Durango vs Toyota Sequoia

by Dan Lienert

These days, Wall Street's industry analysts love to talk about how the Japanese are threatening America's last bastion of automotive dominance: trucks. But as the following comparison of one of the best American sport utility vehicles and one of the best from Japan indicates, the threat is still a distant one (the government considers SUVs "light trucks").


Toyota Motor's Sequoia SUV is longer than DaimlerChrysler's Dodge Durango. The Sequoia seats one more passenger than the Durango (eight versus seven) and has the Toyota badge on it, which means an excellent reputation for quality and reliability. Yet in 2004, the Durango outsold the Sequoia in the United States by a ratio of nearly 2.5-to-1.

Toyota's vehicles--with a few exceptions such as its Echo compact--are among the most competitive in the auto business, and in several cases outsell their American competitors. One need not look too hard, however, to see why the cheaper and more powerful Durango is cleaning house in the showrooms.

For one thing, its volume is increasing because it is, in effect, a hot new player in the full-size SUV game. The Durango used to be more of a midsize SUV, but the vehicle bulked up to 201 inches of overall length after a 2004 overhaul and entered the 204-inch Sequoia's ken.

With added competition from Nissan Motor's new, full-size Armada SUV--whose named was changed from Pathfinder Armada to avoid confusion with Nissan's Pathfinder SUV--the Sequoia is beginning to look old. Its styling isn't great, and, unlike those of the Durango, its buyers can't answer contemporary advertising by saying, "This thing does indeed have a HEMI."

Daimler has had surprising success at resuscitating HEMI, the brand name its Chrysler Group (including Dodge) uses on certain large, high-horsepower engines. According to a statement released in December, Chrysler Group has sold more than 469,000 vehicles with a HEMI inside since introducing its 5.7-liter HEMI V-8 engine for the 2003 model year. In Chrysler Group vehicles where HEMI is offered, the take-rate is 46%. In addition to its optional, 335-hp HEMI V-8, the Durango offers an interior that is comparatively upscale for a Detroit car, and is one of the best examples of Detroit's forte: truck building.

General Motors Ford Motor and Chrysler still build attractive, powerful trucks. Nissan is encroaching on traditional Detroit territory with increasingly big truck engines, and Toyota's next generation full-size pickup--the replacement for the Tundra--will be more on the money in terms of styling.

But America's seeming embrace of domestic truck styling is a mitigating factor in the success of vehicles such as the Durango. The handsome looks of Ford's F-Series pickups help make them the country's best-selling vehicles; after all, the F-Series' competitors offer comparable engines, body styles and varieties of configurations, and have similarly less-than-perfect reputations for reliability.

American truck makers also have more dealers here than the Japanese, and a different audience. The Durango and Sequoia are body-on-frame trucks--vehicles in which the body structures are attached to separate frames, as opposed to the combined body-and-chassis structures of "unitized" cars--and buyers of such vehicles have traditionally tended to be blue collar and, in many cases, distrusting of import brands.

Of course, Toyota's reputation is sterling, and even traditional American truck buyers can't deny the Sequoia. It has 282 hp and a well-designed, roomy interior. It is sold by dealers who don't have a reputation for being particularly friendly, but offer extremely high-quality cars.

However, the Durango also has a geographic advantage over the Sequoia. The popularity and reputation of Japanese cars stems from America's coasts and branches out to the country's middle. But trucks are more popular in the heartland, in places such as the Deep South, the Sun Belt and the Midwest, where far more trucks exist per capita than on the coasts. Trucks are thus something of a red-state phenomenon, something that plays more into the hands of the Midwest-based American automakers than the blue-state-oriented Japanese.

Wall Street analysts recognize a significant threat to domestic automakers. The Japanese are on the way to America with more and bigger trucks--not to mention more and more North American production thereof. Please see the slide show for a closer look at the battle between two of the best light trucks out there.

from here

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Dodge Dakota vs Toyota Tundra

Utility
Drivers with frequent child-duty might favor the Tundra over the Dodge. There's no clear winner between the Dodge Dakota and the Toyota Tundra regarding transporting cargo. There's little the Dodge Dakota can tow that the Toyota cannot.

Performance
The Dodge Dakota is likely to feel a tad slow because of its high horsepower-to-weight ratio compared to the Toyota Tundra. As far as horsepower, the Toyota packs quite a punch and will knock the Dakota down a few rungs. However, note that high horsepower engines often command higher insurance premiums.

Dimensions
The Toyota Tundra is markedly more ponderous than the Dodge. Your wallet will hurt more every time you fill up the Toyota Tundra than the Dakota because of its larger tank. The Toyota Tundra rides lower than the Dodge, which is a good thing for its center of gravity and ease of access. The Toyota Tundra and the Dodge Dakota compete for the same parking spaces.

Convenience
The Dodge Dakota's fuel tank will need to be replenished a bit more often than the unit in the Toyota.

Cost
In terms of gas mileage, the Dodge Dakota and the Toyota Tundra don't differ much. The Toyota Tundra will tax your gas budget markedly more than the Dodge will. The Toyota Tundra isn't much more expensive than the Dodge when it comes to MSRP. The Toyota Tundra is significantly more expensive than the Dodge Dakota as far as out-the-door price.

Handling
The Dakota and the Toyota have roughly similar tires. With their comparable turning circles, the Dodge Dakota and the Tundra very likely handle roughly the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The Toyota Tundra's engine is considerably more sizeable than the Dakota's. Remember that more massive engines may use more gasoline than smaller ones. The Tundra packs quite a punch compared to the Dodge Dakota with respect to torque, which is the force that lets you accelerate quickly. Torque is roughly equivalent to acceleration, and in this respect, the Tundra is significantly more powerful than the Dodge Dakota.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the Toyota Tundra offers a bit more head room than the Dodge Dakota, there frankly isn't much of a difference. While the rear of the Dodge Dakota provides a bit more head- and leg-room than the Toyota Tundra, there honestly isn't much of a difference.

Overview
The Toyota and the Dodge Dakota have the same basic warranty.
from here

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Dodge Ram vs Toyota Tacoma

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. The Tacoma is considerably cheaper to get to the dealership than the Dodge. Regarding fuel economy, the Tacoma bests the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500. The Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 consumes a lot of gasoline compared to the Tacoma. In terms of MSRP, the Toyota Tacoma costs quite a bit less than the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500. Regarding final price, the Toyota Tacoma costs quite a bit less than the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500. The Toyota Tacoma will save you a bundle at the pump every year compared to the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500.

Utility
Drivers with frequent kid-duty might favor the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 over the Toyota Tacoma. There's no clear winner between the Toyota Tacoma and the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 when it comes to hauling capacity. Towing is markedly more the Dodge's forte than it is the Toyota Tacoma's.

Convenience
You will definitely have to visit your friendly gas station more often with the Toyota Tacoma than with the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500. The Toyota Tacoma's fuel tank will need to be replenished more often than the unit in the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the Dodge offers a bit more head room than the Toyota, there frankly isn't much of a difference. The ampler interior dimensions of the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 make it quite a bit roomier for your passengers than the Tacoma.

Dimensions
The Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 is markedly heavier than the Toyota Tacoma. Your wallet will hurt more every time you fill up the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 than the Toyota Tacoma because of its more capacious tank. The Toyota Tacoma rides lower than the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500, which is a good thing for its center of gravity and ease of access. The Toyota Tacoma fits in smaller parking spaces than the Ram Pickup 1500. The Toyota's shorter wheelbase will give a more agile feel in daily traffic. On the flip side, the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 is likely to have a smoother, more stable ride.

Performance
Both the Toyota Tacoma and the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 are likely to feel a little sluggish because of their high horsepower-to-weight ratio. In terms of horsepower, the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 packs quite a punch and will knock the Toyota Tacoma down a few rungs. On the flip side, note that high horsepower engines often command higher insurance premiums.

Handling
With its tighter turning circle, the Toyota Tacoma is very likely more agile than the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500, something to consider if you do a lot of city driving; however, remember that a vehicle with a tight turning circle may feel a bit twitchy on the highway.

Drivetrain
The Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 has a bigger engine than the Toyota Tacoma. Note that smaller engines are often cheaper to fix, but a smaller engine usually has to work a little harder. Torque equals pickup, and the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 will have picked up and gone by the time the Toyota Tacoma finally gets moving. Torque is roughly equivalent to acceleration, and in this respect, the Dodge Ram Pickup 1500 is tremendously more powerful than the Toyota Tacoma.

Overview
The Dodge and the Toyota Tacoma have the same basic warranty.

Other
The Toyota Tacoma emits fewer smog-forming pollutants per 15,000 miles than the Dodge.

from here

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Dodge Charger

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. It costs roughly the same to get the Dodge Charger to the dealership as the typical fullsize sedan. There really isn't much of a difference in gas mileage here, but if you must know, the typical fullsize sedan is slightly more economical than the Dodge Charger. In terms of gas mileage, the typical fullsize sedan and the Dodge Charger don't differ much. The typical fullsize sedan is markedly less costly than the Charger as far as MSRP.

Utility
There's no clear winner between the typical fullsize sedan and the Dodge Charger regarding transporting cargo. The Charger and the typical fullsize sedan can accommodate the same number of passengers. The Dodge Charger outpulls the typical fullsize sedan by a big margin.

Convenience
The Dodge Charger's fuel tank will need to be replenished a tad more often than the unit in the typical fullsize sedan.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the typical fullsize sedan offers a bit more head room than the Dodge Charger, there frankly isn't much of a difference. While the rear of the typical fullsize sedan provides a bit more head- and leg-room than the Dodge Charger, there frankly isn't much of a difference.

Dimensions
The Dodge Charger is a bit heavier than the typical fullsize sedan. The average fullsize sedan's tank is roughly the same size as the Charger's, though the Charger's is a tad more capacious. The Charger and the average fullsize sedan compete for the same parking spaces.

Performance
Regarding horsepower, the Charger packs quite a punch and will knock the average fullsize sedan down a few rungs. On the other hand, keep in mind that high horsepower engines often command higher insurance premiums.

Handling
The typical fullsize sedan and the Dodge Charger have about comparable tires. With their similar turning radiuses, the Dodge Charger and the typical fullsize sedan doubtless handle about the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The average fullsize sedan's engine is considerably smaller than the Dodge Charger's. Keep in mind that smaller engines can be stressed more; on the flip side, smaller engines are often cheaper to fix. The Charger packs quite a punch compared to the average fullsize sedan as far as torque, which is the force that lets you accelerate quickly.

Overview
The basic after-sale protection that comes with the Charger isn't quite as generous as the typical fullsize sedan's. When it comes to after-sale protection against corrosion, the typical fullsize sedan and the Dodge Charger have significantly similar coverage.


from here

Toyota Avalon

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. It costs roughly the same to get the Toyota Avalon to the dealership as the Dodge Charger. With respect to gas mileage, the Avalon has the Dodge beat. The Dodge Charger will tax your gas budget substantially more than the Toyota Avalon will. As far as MSRP, the Dodge doesn't cost much less than the Toyota. The Dodge Charger will cost you a bunch of money in gas every year compared to the Toyota Avalon.

Utility
The Dodge Charger's more massive trunk will accommodate more sizeable objects than the Toyota Avalon. The Dodge Charger and the Toyota Avalon can accommodate the same number of passengers. Towing is substantially more the Dodge Charger's forte than it is the Avalon's.

Convenience
You'll quite certainly have to take the Charger for a fill-up more often than the Toyota because of its tank size and gas mileage.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the Toyota offers a bit more head room than the Dodge, there frankly isn't much of a difference. The Avalon offers more head- and leg-room to your passengers than the Dodge Charger does.

Dimensions
The Dodge Charger is markedly more ponderous than the Toyota Avalon. The Toyota Avalon's tank is approximately the same size as the Dodge Charger's, though the Dodge's is a little larger. The Avalon and the Charger compete for the same parking spaces. The Dodge Charger's longer wheelbase will likely result in a smoother, more stable ride; however, the Toyota may give a more agile feel in daily traffic.

Performance
As far as horsepower, the Charger packs quite a wallop and will knock the Toyota Avalon down a few rungs. On the flip side, keep in mind that high horsepower engines often command higher insurance premiums.

Handling
The Dodge Charger's rear-wheel drive layout likely gives it better dry traction than the Toyota Avalon; however, the Toyota Avalon's front-wheel drive layout likely provides better traction in rain, snow or ice. The Dodge Charger and the Toyota Avalon have about comparable tires. With their comparable turning circles, the Toyota and the Dodge definitely handle roughly the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The Dodge's engine is tremendously larger than the Avalon's. Note that larger engines may use more gas than smaller ones. Torque equals pickup, and the Dodge Charger will have picked up and gone by the time the Toyota Avalon finally gets moving.

Overview
The Toyota Avalon and the Dodge Charger have the same basic after-sale protection.

from here

Dodge Charger vs Toyota Avalon

Cost
The destination charge is a standard charge for transporting the vehicle from its point of origin to the dealer. It costs roughly the same to get the Toyota Avalon to the dealership as the Dodge Charger. With respect to gas mileage, the Avalon has the Dodge beat. The Dodge Charger will tax your gas budget substantially more than the Toyota Avalon will. As far as MSRP, the Dodge doesn't cost much less than the Toyota. The Dodge Charger will cost you a bunch of money in gas every year compared to the Toyota Avalon.

Utility
The Dodge Charger's more massive trunk will accommodate more sizeable objects than the Toyota Avalon. The Dodge Charger and the Toyota Avalon can accommodate the same number of passengers. Towing is substantially more the Dodge Charger's forte than it is the Avalon's.

Convenience
You'll quite certainly have to take the Charger for a fill-up more often than the Toyota because of its tank size and gas mileage.

Comfort
While the front cabin in the Toyota offers a bit more head room than the Dodge, there frankly isn't much of a difference. The Avalon offers more head- and leg-room to your passengers than the Dodge Charger does.

Dimensions
The Dodge Charger is markedly more ponderous than the Toyota Avalon. The Toyota Avalon's tank is approximately the same size as the Dodge Charger's, though the Dodge's is a little larger. The Avalon and the Charger compete for the same parking spaces. The Dodge Charger's longer wheelbase will likely result in a smoother, more stable ride; however, the Toyota may give a more agile feel in daily traffic.

Performance
As far as horsepower, the Charger packs quite a wallop and will knock the Toyota Avalon down a few rungs. On the flip side, keep in mind that high horsepower engines often command higher insurance premiums.

Handling
The Dodge Charger's rear-wheel drive layout likely gives it better dry traction than the Toyota Avalon; however, the Toyota Avalon's front-wheel drive layout likely provides better traction in rain, snow or ice. The Dodge Charger and the Toyota Avalon have about comparable tires. With their comparable turning circles, the Toyota and the Dodge definitely handle roughly the same into and out of tight spots.

Drivetrain
The Dodge's engine is tremendously larger than the Avalon's. Note that larger engines may use more gas than smaller ones. Torque equals pickup, and the Dodge Charger will have picked up and gone by the time the Toyota Avalon finally gets moving.

Overview
The Toyota Avalon and the Dodge Charger have the same basic after-sale protection.


fron here

The History of the Toyota Celica

It is 1998 and the Celica is clinging to life. The MR2 and Supra have been withdrawn to Japanese shores and the Celica is on life support. The current model of the Celica hasn't been truly redesigned since 1993...an eternity when you consider the short life spans of sporty cars. Although the Celica is officially produced until 1999 many US Toyota dealers don't even see the model on their lots.
Rumors have the Celica disappearing from the Toyota lineup entirely.

Toyota decides to completely revamp the Celica and give the market what it is looking for. Aiming for the market that Honda has dominated so well for the past few years with the Civic/Integra, Toyota aims directly for the top of the line Integra GS-R. No longer building
the Celica as a sporty/luxury car, the Toyota Celica is now designed for the inexpensive performance minded market. Extreme, Young and Racy is the new target Toyota is hoping to meet with the new Celica...

Design-wise Toyota turns to its CALTY design center to find a design that appeals to the younger market. Turning outside the Japanese designers Toyota hopes depart from the conservative "safe" image that Toyota is all too well known for. Below are the Sketches
that Toyota decides to aim for.










Aiming squarely for the top of the Integra line, Toyota turns to Yamaha to produce an engine that outperforms the Honda version in every way. The Honda patent for variable valve timing (VTEC) expires and Toyota is now allowed to introduce its version variable valve timing in the form of VVTl-i (Variable Valve Timing with lift and intelligence). A technology which is superior to Honda's VTEC Toyota and Yamaha introduce this new technology in the Celica with the
2ZZ-GE engine. In a factory built engine Toyota nearly matches Honda's hand assembled, port and polished Integra Type-R, and does away clearly dominates Honda's stock output in the GS-R (160HP)...clearly an accomplishment.

The first the public sees of the new exciting Celica comes in the form of the Toyota XYR concept at the Detroit International Auto show in 1999....










With rave reviews, Toyota almost immediately begins production for a release later in the year. Aside from the huge aluminum spoiler the XYR basically becomes the new seventh generation Celica. Toyota releases the Celica in two trims worldwide...the GT with a 140HP engine with VVT-i and the GTS with a stated 180HP or 192 HP from 1.8L with VVTl-i. Europe receives the GT-S one year later.








North American GT




North American GT-S

from here